ARCS

arx

CoinYQ Dossier

ARX reported a fall to 400 million, but its contract still allows 20 billion

ARCS changed the number it asked holders to follow. It began with 20 billion ARX, announced a burn intended to leave 400 million and reported the one-for-fifty burn completed on 25 May 2021, without publishing a transaction hash or ledger reconciliation in the cited post. It now reports 5 billion issued, while the old 20-billion contract ceiling remains and the current owner can still mint, burn from named accounts and extend transfer locks.

An issuer-reported burn did not remove the old ceiling

On 18 May 2021 the team said it would burn 19.6 billion ARX, mainly from team and undistributed balances, to leave 400 million without touching ordinary holder balances. It scheduled the operation for 21 May and reported on 25 May that the one-for-fifty burn had completed. That is first-party completion evidence, but the post did not provide a transaction hash or independent ledger reconciliation of the exact execution.

ARCS 2.0 now reports 5 billion issued. The verified contract still sets maxSupply at 20 billion, leaving 15 billion of technically available, owner-controlled minting room.

The first data bank was half chain, half company server

The 2020 prototype put tamper-evident hashes on Substrate while raw personal records stayed on IFA servers. IFA co-signed transactions to hide fees and latency.

The arrangement made a familiar product possible, but sovereignty also depended on the server, signing service and unfinished consent controls.

The test market included an invisible buyer

In August 2022 users answered surveys on BSC testnet and accepted offers. The DataBank team randomly simulated buyer interest and approval.

That tested the workflow, not independent demand. ARCS later cited the cost of recruiting both sides as a reason for stagnation.

Hotels become the new acquisition engine

ARCS 2.0 asks SSG Group properties to create revenue and guests before a data market reaches scale. A stay could produce payment, reward, review and consented activity data.

ARX itself is not a deed. The paper does not bind ordinary tokens to an identified property, SPV, title registry or enforceable redemption.

Decentralization comes after the businesses work

IFA issues and manages ARX; SSG Group supplies property operations. The contract owner keeps mint, burn and lock powers while DAO design remains under consideration.

A holder owns transferable ARX. Discounts, rewards, memberships, staking and data fees remain proposed uses whose value depends on SSG services actually accepting the token; the reviewed sources do not identify a current service that makes those uses an enforceable holder right.

How the project changed

2020-02
Prototype stores hashes while IFA stores data
Substrate validates registration and tamper detection, but raw records remain on IFA servers.
2020-03-09
Prototype architecture is published
An added IFA signature hides transaction fees and latency from users.
2021-05-18
Fifty-to-one burn is detailed
The project says 20 billion will become 400 million, mainly by burning team and undistributed balances.
2021-05-21
Burn execution is scheduled
The May 18 article names May 21 as the intended execution date; a schedule is not completion evidence.
2021-05-25
The issuer reports the burn complete
ARCS says the one-for-fifty burn finished the previous week, without publishing a transaction hash or ledger reconciliation in the post.
2022-02-21
Bridge and DataBank reach an audit milestone
The project reports four PeckShield findings fixed before planned BSC deployment.
2022-08-31
AIre DataBank opens a limited test
BSC-testnet users answer surveys while the operator simulates buyer selection and approval.
2025-08-15
ARCS 2.0 places DAO governance in the future
RWA lodging and data markets become two linked wheels; DAO design remains under consideration.

What to verify before relying on the token story

The owner can mint 15 billion more ARX before reaching the contract ceiling, so 5 billion is policy supply rather than the technical cap.
Owner-only burn and lock functions can reduce or immobilize a specified account.
The community allocation lacks a complete wallet-level release calendar, creating uncertainty about when liquid supply can enter the market.
If the SSG Group relationship ends, ARCS could lose both lodging revenue and the guest activity meant to seed its future data market.
Ordinary ARX has no identified property or redemption claim, so treating the RWA reserve as backing can overstate what a holder could recover.
The operator-simulated 2022 trial tested screens and settlement flow, but it did not establish that independent data buyers would continue paying.
Staking, future burns, data dividends and DAO voting may never arrive as described; the whitepaper itself says the roadmap is not guaranteed.

Evidence and primary sources

Last evidence review: 2026-09-05

What is ARCS?

ARCS (ARX) is an 18-decimal Ethereum ERC-20 issued by IFA Co., Ltd. at `0x7d8DafF6d70CEAd12c6f077048552Cf89130A2B1`. ARC, Arcus and other ARX contracts are different assets. ARCS 2.0 links SSG Group accommodation and real estate to a future consent-based data bank; it is a relaunch of the older AIre project, not a new Layer 1 or a deed to a particular building.

What problem does ARCS solve?

ARCS 1.0 had to recruit data providers and buyers simultaneously. Its own retrospective says the cost helped stall the project. The 2020 prototype exposed the compromise: hashes on a Substrate chain, raw records on IFA servers and an added IFA signature. ARCS 2.0 starts with hotel guests, hoping stays create revenue, users and data before an open data market exists.

How does ARCS work?

The verified ERC-20 has a 20-billion immutable maximum. Its owner can mint to that ceiling, burn tokens from a specified account and extend an address lock. The project announced a reduction to 400 million on 18 May 2021, scheduled the burn for 21 May, then reported on 25 May that the one-for-fifty burn had completed. The cited report did not include a transaction hash or independent ledger reconciliation. Whitepaper v3.0 later called 5 billion the total supply and said it was issued at once; live totalSupply matched 5 billion on 5 September 2026. That later state does not by itself reconstruct the May 2021 execution. ARX is proposed for lodging discounts, rewards, memberships, staking and data fees. The RWA reserve does not identify a property, SPV, title or redemption ratio for ordinary ARX. DAO governance and data dividends remain later roadmap phases.

Key facts

ARCS uses ticker ARX on Ethereum at `0x7d8DafF6d70CEAd12c6f077048552Cf89130A2B1`; IFA Co., Ltd. is the named issuer.
The contract ceiling is 20 billion ARX. Live total supply was 5 billion on September 5, 2026, so the issued amount is not a hard cap.
The current owner can mint up to the ceiling, burn from a specified account and extend that account’s transfer lock.
On 18 May 2021 the project announced a reduction from 20 billion to 400 million, scheduled it for 21 May and reported completion on 25 May. No transaction hash or independent ledger reconciliation was identified in the cited posts.
Whitepaper v3.0 allocates 40% to community, 8% to early investors, 8% to new investors, 16% to an RWA reserve, 16% to marketing and development, 8% to team and 4% to an ecosystem reserve.
The 2020 prototype stored tamper-evident hashes on Substrate while IFA servers retained the original personal records.
The 2022 DataBank test used testnet ARX and an operator-simulated buyer, so it did not demonstrate continuing independent demand.
ARCS 2.0 proposes accommodation, real-estate and later data-market uses; ordinary ARX has no identified property title, fixed yield or universal redemption claim.

Official links

Official website

Related coins

Frequently asked questions

Which ARX is covered here?

The subject is the Ethereum ERC-20 issued by IFA Co., Ltd. at `0x7d8DafF6d70CEAd12c6f077048552Cf89130A2B1`. Tokens named ARC, Arcus or other ARX contracts are different assets.

Why do the numbers 20 billion, 400 million and 5 billion all appear?

The contract began with a 20-billion ceiling. The project announced a burn to 400 million on 18 May 2021 and reported it completed on 25 May, without a cited transaction hash or independent ledger reconciliation. Whitepaper v3.0 later described 5 billion as issued. That later state is separate evidence, while the contract ceiling remained 20 billion.

Can the owner create or restrict ARX?

Yes. Verified code gives the owner authority to mint up to the ceiling, burn tokens from a specified account and extend transfer locks. These are not holder votes.

Does ARX represent ownership of a hotel or other property?

No identified property, special-purpose vehicle, title entry or enforceable redemption ratio is assigned to ordinary ARX in the reviewed documents.

Did the original DataBank operate as an independent market?

A prototype and limited test existed, but raw data remained on IFA servers and the 2022 test had the operator simulate buyer interest and approval. That does not prove sustained outside demand.

Why did ARCS 2.0 turn to accommodation?

The project says the first two-sided data market was costly to start. SSG Group properties are intended to produce customers, revenue and consented activity data before a broader data market develops.

Are staking, data dividends and DAO votes live holder rights?

The reviewed whitepaper places them in phased plans and expressly does not guarantee the roadmap. Holding ARX alone provides no present corporate vote, fixed return or general claim on business revenue.

External trackers

Choose a tracking site for ARCS:

Track price on CoinGecko Track price on CoinMarketCap Track price on Binance