CoinYQ Dossier

The ledger came first; the 80 billion XRP grant tied Ripple to its afterlife

Three engineers completed a payment ledger before the company now called Ripple existed. Their choice to create 100 billion XRP at once and give 80 billion to that company financed an ecosystem, produced a lasting supply overhang and eventually put Ripple’s methods of sale—not every XRP transfer—before a federal court.

Schwartz, McCaleb and Britto replaced mining with chosen trust

David Schwartz, Jed McCaleb and Arthur Britto began work in 2011 on a ledger that could settle value without proof-of-work mining. By June 2012 the XRP Ledger was live. Its servers did not race for a block reward; each listened to validators on a chosen Unique Node List and compared proposals until a supermajority agreed on the next state.

That design moved power away from miners without making trust disappear. A server operator chooses its list, but safety depends on strong overlap with the lists other operators use. Ripple and the XRP Ledger Foundation publish the two recommended lists used by default configurations, so publishers influence which independent validators receive broad trust even though they do not approve transactions themselves.

A company formed after launch received four-fifths of the currency

Chris Larsen joined after the ledger launched. In September 2012, Larsen, McCaleb and Britto formed NewCoin, quickly renamed OpenCoin; Schwartz served as chief cryptographer and Britto as an adviser. The company later became Ripple Labs and then Ripple. Calling all of this “Ripple” hid an important sequence: the code and currency existed before the corporation took shape.

The ledger began with 100 billion XRP. The founders gave 80 billion to the company so it could build uses around the network, leaving 20 billion with the founders. The grant gave Ripple a way to fund staff, market liquidity and partnerships, while also making the private company’s sales policy economically important to a public ledger it did not exclusively operate.

Escrow slowed access to inventory without erasing it

By 2017 Ripple still held enough XRP for an abrupt sale to worry markets. It placed 55 billion into 55 on-ledger escrows, initially making one billion available on the first day of each month. Ledger rules enforce the release date; they do not decide whether Ripple sells, distributes or re-locks the amount after release. Unused XRP was placed into new escrows at the end of the queue.

The mechanism created a visible ceiling rather than a fixed circulation schedule. On 30 June 2026 Ripple reported 37,656,053,914 XRP held in total, including 32.6 billion in escrow, and 62,329,587,596 distributed. Meanwhile every transaction destroyed a small fee. Ledger 106,765,783 therefore showed 99,985,620,168.198087 XRP—below the original 100 billion, with no mining process able to restore the difference.

The SEC challenged sales; Torres divided the answer by transaction

On 22 December 2020 the SEC sued Ripple, Larsen and Brad Garlinghouse, alleging more than $1.3 billion in unregistered offers and sales. The complaint was an allegation, not the result. On 13 July 2023 Judge Analisa Torres separated the record: Ripple’s contractual institutional sales satisfied Howey, while blind programmatic exchange sales did not because buyers could not know their money went to Ripple. Other distributions and the executives’ sales also produced different results.

The distinction matters because the court did not treat XRP itself as an investment contract in every setting. Nor did it bless every sale. It found Ripple liable for institutional transactions and rejected its fair-notice defense for those sales; the SEC later dismissed its aiding-and-abetting claims against Larsen and Garlinghouse before trial.

A failed settlement left the final judgment where it was

On 7 August 2024 the district court ordered Ripple to pay $125,035,150 and enjoined future violations of Securities Act registration rules. Both sides appealed. In 2025 they proposed reducing the payment to $50 million and dissolving the injunction, but the district court declined the requested relief. That proposed compromise never became the operative judgment.

The parties instead dismissed the SEC appeal and Ripple cross-appeal on 7 August 2025. The litigation ended with the 2023 transaction-specific rulings and the 2024 penalty and injunction still in place. XRP continued to settle on a ledger governed by validator trust and amendments, while Ripple remained a major holder constrained in how it could conduct future institutional sales.

How the project changed

  1. 2011
    Three engineers begin the ledger

    Schwartz, McCaleb and Britto pursue payment consensus without mining.

  2. 2012-06
    XRPL launches with 100 billion XRP

    The entire initial supply exists before the company takes its later form.

  3. 2012-09
    NewCoin forms and receives 80 billion

    Larsen joins; the company soon becomes OpenCoin and later Ripple.

  4. 2017-12-08
    Ripple completes the 55 billion escrow

    Fifty-five one-billion-XRP escrows impose a visible monthly access ceiling.

  5. 2020-12-22
    The SEC files its complaint

    The agency alleges more than $1.3 billion in unregistered offers and sales.

  6. 2023-07-13
    Torres separates the sale categories

    Institutional sales and programmatic exchange sales receive different Howey outcomes.

  7. 2024-08-07
    Final judgment imposes penalty and injunction

    Ripple is ordered to pay $125,035,150 and faces a continuing Section 5 injunction.

  8. 2025-08-07
    Both appeals end

    The parties dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal, leaving the judgment in force.

  9. 2026-06-30
    Ripple holdings as of 30 June

    The company’s snapshot lists 37.656 billion XRP held as of this date, including 32.6 billion in escrow; this is the holdings reference date.

Evidence and primary sources

Last evidence review: 2026-09-05

More stories about this project

What is XRP?

XRP is the native currency of the XRP Ledger, an open network launched in June 2012 for payments and exchange. David Schwartz, Jed McCaleb and Arthur Britto wrote the early ledger; Chris Larsen joined the group that formed the company now called Ripple after the network was running.

The names once overlapped, but the objects do not. XRPL is the ledger and open-source server software, XRP is its scarce native asset, and Ripple is a private company that builds payment and custody products and holds a large XRP inventory.

What problem does XRP solve?

The founders wanted a way to agree on payments without Bitcoin-style mining. XRPL made each server choose a list of validators it would trust not to collude, then used repeated proposals to settle the next ledger. That removed mining rewards but replaced one coordination problem with another: servers need sufficiently overlapping, diverse trusted lists to stay on one history.

The initial distribution created a second problem. Of the 100 billion XRP made at inception, 80 billion went to the new company. Ripple could fund development and liquidity from that stock, but markets also had to price the possibility of company sales. The 2017 escrow constrained the timing of access rather than canceling Ripple’s holdings.

How does XRP work?

Each XRPL server processes transactions under the same rules and evaluates proposals from its own Unique Node List. A supermajority of trusted validators closes a ledger; amendments that change transaction processing require more than 80% support for two weeks before activation. Publishers of recommended validator lists influence the common trust set, while each operator can choose its own list.

XRP pays transaction costs, supports account reserves and can bridge issued assets through the ledger’s exchange paths. Fees go to nobody: they are destroyed. No normal transaction can create XRP, so the original 100 billion declines gradually. Ripple’s supply escrow is a separate set of ledger objects: scheduled XRP becomes available to Ripple, and unused amounts can be placed at the back of the release queue.

Key facts

  • Schwartz, McCaleb and Britto began XRPL development in 2011 and completed the live ledger in June 2012; Larsen joined the company formed that September.
  • All 100 billion XRP existed at inception. The founders transferred 80 billion to NewCoin/OpenCoin, now Ripple, and retained 20 billion.
  • Ripple, XRP and XRP Ledger are separate: a company, a native currency and an open-source public ledger.
  • Servers select trusted validators through UNLs; consensus and amendment voting do not issue new XRP.
  • An XRPL amendment activates after more than 80% trusted-validator support is sustained for two weeks.
  • Every transaction destroys its XRP fee; validated ledger 106,765,783 reported 99,985,620,168.198087 XRP on 4 September 2026 UTC.
  • Ripple locked 55 billion XRP in 2017 escrows, originally with up to one billion becoming available each month and unused XRP re-escrowed later.
  • At 30 June 2026 Ripple reported 37,656,053,914 XRP held, including 32.6 billion in escrow, and 62,329,587,596 distributed.
  • The SEC alleged more than $1.3 billion in unregistered XRP sales in December 2020; the allegation was tested transaction by transaction rather than by the token name alone.
  • The July 2023 order granted the SEC summary judgment on Ripple’s institutional sales and the defendants summary judgment on programmatic sales, other distributions and the executives’ own sales.
  • The August 2024 judgment imposed $125,035,150 and an injunction; both appeals were dismissed on 7 August 2025, leaving that judgment effective.

Compare the designs

Bitcoin vs XRP

How Bitcoin and XRP differ beyond price

Compare their purpose, consensus, supply, settlement, energy use, custody, governance, and risks.

Read the comparison →

Official links

Categories

Related coins

Frequently asked questions

Did Ripple create the XRP Ledger?

Schwartz, McCaleb and Britto developed the ledger in 2011–2012. After it launched, Larsen joined the group that formed NewCoin/OpenCoin. The company later became Ripple and received 80 billion XRP to develop uses for the ledger.

Can validators mint more XRP?

No normal XRPL transaction can create XRP, and validation does not pay block rewards. The supply began at 100 billion and falls as transaction costs are destroyed.

Does Ripple control every validator?

No. Anyone can run a server or validator and each server chooses its UNL. Ripple and the XRPL Foundation publish recommended lists, which gives list publishers influence because safety depends on substantial overlap among the lists servers actually use.

Does escrow release one billion XRP into the market every month?

It makes up to one billion available to Ripple under the original schedule. Availability is not the same as a market sale: Ripple can use some and put unused XRP into new escrows at the end of the queue.

What did Judge Torres decide about XRP?

The court examined transactions. Ripple’s institutional sales were investment contracts, while its blind programmatic sales and several other distributions did not satisfy Howey on the summary-judgment record. The decision did not turn every possible XRP transfer into one legal category.

Did the SEC case disappear in 2025?

No. The SEC and Ripple dismissed their appeal and cross-appeal on 7 August 2025. The 2024 final judgment, $125,035,150 penalty and injunction remained in effect.

External trackers

Choose a tracking site for XRP: