APES

apes
CoinYQ Dossier

APES: a reward story that does not travel with the name

A whitepaper hosted on the APES domain describes rewards for promoting a token. The cached token page offers a different attraction: zero transaction tax and access to products. They point to different contracts, and the available record does not establish that one became the other.

The old design offered rewards for attention

The whitepaper is dated December 2021. It proposes a token that redistributes part of a 10% trading tax: holding and promoting APES on social media could together earn up to 8% reflections. Its design attempts to turn community publicity into an activity with token rewards. The document identifies contract 0x4c2a…5a8f, not the 0xfbd0…46de contract followed on this page.

That distinction prevents a tempting but unsupported history. The current project’s GitHub profile claims a March 2022 launch, but neither that statement nor the older PDF supplies a migration transaction or announcement linking the contracts. Hosting the PDF under the same domain does not transfer its reward promises to a new balance. The December 2021 document describes a dated, different design; continuity remains unproven.

Two different reasons to hold an APES token

The cached page that identifies 0xfbd0…46de calls it a zero-tax token and advertises GemTools PRO access and eligibility for NFT whitelists. It presents the holder as a potential user of those products, but the cached marketing does not establish when they launched or what current entitlement the contract enforces.

The main domain failed to resolve during the September 5, 2026 review, and no reachable product page or primary contract was found that connected the cached claims to holder rights. This does not prove that a product never existed. It limits what can be attributed to the selected token today: a transferable balance is identifiable, while GemTools PRO access, NFT eligibility and any legal claim on an operator require additional evidence.

Zero fees describe a state, not the entire contract

The September 5 reads returned 900 million APES, zero transaction and burn fees, and an unpaused state. The owner slot returned address 0x…0001, while the fee receiver remained a separate address. Runtime selectors appeared consistent with pause, blacklist, fee, burn-fee and ownership functions. Without verified Solidity source or a deployment record, these observations do not establish every permission check or prove that all privileged paths are disabled.

Distribution and liquidity add another limit to the product pitch. The cached page allocates 70% to the community and 10% each to development, marketing and CEX/cross-chain use, but separately says 80% was available at launch. It supplies no wallet reconciliation, and its Unicrypt liquidity-lock claim lacks a verifiable lock transaction. Pools for the exact address appeared in February 2026; the reviewed feed showed uneven reserves and almost no activity. Those observations cannot date a product launch or guarantee that the displayed price can be obtained for a substantial sale.

How the project changed

  1. 2021-12
    A different APES design describes social rewards

    The whitepaper dated December 2021 names 0x4c2a…5a8f and describes trading-tax-funded rewards. It does not establish a launch or migration for the current 0xfbd0…46de token.

Evidence and primary sources

Last evidence review: 2026-09-05

What is APES?

This APES is the BNB Smart Chain token at 0xfbd09f771d1d76275b58eca4016978a8a8dc46de. It is not ApeCoin or the token in the December 2021 social-reward whitepaper. The current contract records transferable balances; a balance alone does not establish GemTools PRO access, NFT eligibility or ownership of an operator.

What problem does APES solve?

The materials offer different reasons to hold APES. The old paper ties rewards to publicity, while the cached page for the current contract promotes zero tax, GemTools PRO and NFT access. No verified migration joins those contracts or transfers the old promises. The original launch and the timing of any product changes cannot be reconstructed confidently from this record.

How does APES work?

The selected contract supports token balances and approvals. On September 5, 2026 it returned the name and symbol APES, 18 decimals, 900,000,000 units, txFee 0, burnFee 0 and paused false. Its owner was 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000001.

Runtime selectors appeared consistent with pausing, blacklisting, fee changes, burn-fee changes and ownership operations. With no verified Solidity source or deployment record available in the reviewed channels, that is an incomplete view of permissions. The owner value does not prove that every privileged route is absent; the fee receiver is a separate address.

The cached allocation is 70% community, 10% development, 10% marketing and 10% CEX/cross-chain, alongside a conflicting 80%-at-launch statement. Neither a wallet-level reconciliation nor a verifiable Unicrypt lock transaction accompanied it. The February 2026 pools identify trading venues for this address, not a proven launch date or dependable sale depth.

Key facts

  • The selected BNB Smart Chain contract is 0xfbd09f771d1d76275b58eca4016978a8a8dc46de.
  • It returns the name APES, symbol APES and 18 decimals.
  • The September 5, 2026 supply read returned 900,000,000 APES.
  • At that review, transaction and burn fees were zero and the contract was not paused.
  • The owner read returned 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000001; this is not a complete proof that privileged paths are disabled.
  • The December 2021 whitepaper instead identifies 0x4c2a5a1a4b01d293affaa4739f884d7a905a5a8f.
  • The cached 70/10/10/10 allocation conflicts with its separate statement that 80% was available at launch.
  • No current product entitlement or verifiable liquidity-lock transaction was identified in the reviewed material.

Official links

Categories

Related coins

Frequently asked questions

Which APES is this?

Only 0xfbd09f771d1d76275b58eca4016978a8a8dc46de on BNB Smart Chain. It is not ApeCoin or the older contract 0x4c2a…5a8f.

Does it charge a trading tax or pay reflections?

The reviewed transaction and burn fees were zero. The December 2021 reflections paper identifies another contract and cannot establish rewards for this token.

Has ownership been renounced?

The owner read returned 0x…0001. Without verified source and a complete account of permissions, that does not establish that every privileged route has been disabled.

Are the GemTools PRO and NFT benefits available?

The cached project page promoted GemTools PRO access and NFT-whitelist eligibility, but the reviewed materials did not provide a reachable product page or primary contract proving current entitlements. That evidence limit does not establish that the products never existed.

Does the supply show how much can be sold?

No. The 900-million supply is a contract value. The reviewed pools had weak or inconsistent activity and reserves, so that number does not establish executable market depth.

External trackers

Choose a tracking site for APES: