DAI on PulseChain

dai
Rank #261•PulseChain Ecosystem, Made in USA
CoinYQ Dossier

The dollar token whose code arrived without its institution

At one timestamp, PulseChain copied a complete Ethereum ledger. DAI's address, balances, permissions and connected contracts appeared intact. From the next block onward, however, the copy had to discover whether a peg could live without the same collateral market, oracle operators, governance and bridge exit.

The address woke up twice

PulseChain chose Ethereum block 17,232,999, timestamped 10 May 2023 at 22:36:11 UTC, as its state snapshot. Chain ID 369 began with copied accounts, balances and contract storage.

That is why 0x6B175474E89094C44Da98b954EedeAC495271d0F says Dai Stablecoin on both chains. No Maker transaction minted a new cross-chain asset and no bridge locked Ethereum DAI for the copied balances. A fork reproduced a ledger entry.

From then on the two contracts lived under different consensus and economic histories. PulseChain’s documented state fork explains why the address continued on both chains; matching addresses alone do not prove identical bytecode. Neither address continuity nor copied state proves issuer continuity, common collateral or a shared redemption pool.

The mint key survived inside a copied machine

Maker's DAI contract is a direct token, not a proxy. It offers transfers, approvals, permits and self-burn. It also retains the ward map: authorized addresses can mint, and the published Ethereum design gives that role to DaiJoin at 0x9759…1A28.

DaiJoin is only a doorway. On the original system it translates between external DAI and internal Vat balances. Vault debt, collateral adapters and liquidation rules provide the accounting around that doorway. PulseChain copied those storage slots too, but all later activity belongs to the fork.

The divergence is visible in supply. On 5 September 2026 the PulseChain explorer reported 44,362,143,339.302615804780888911 DAI, not a frozen May 2023 quantity. The number proves mutable history; the explorer does not certify what economic value stands behind each unit.

A burn button is not a cashier

Anyone holding DAI can call burn on their own balance. The result is fewer tokens at that address and lower supply. The call contains no instruction to deliver dollars, stablecoins or collateral.

In Maker's historical Ethereum design, collateral recovery used the End emergency-settlement system. After governance stopped the system (cage) and the accounting conditions were met, a user could register DAI (pack) and obtain collateral at settlement prices (cash). That sequence depends on Vat records, adapters, available collateral and functioning system control; its current operation on PulseChain was not established.

A state fork can reproduce the starting numbers but not guarantee future oracle service, liquidations, governance decisions or collateral liquidity. No reviewed record promises that PulseChain fork DAI will receive a maintained Maker/Sky settlement, much less ordinary one-dollar fiat redemption.

The bridge created a second DAI

PulseChain later offered an Ethereum bridge. DAI that actually crosses it is represented at 0xefD766cCb38EaF1dfd701853BFCe31359239F305, which the explorer calls Dai Stablecoin from Ethereum. At review it reported 12,820,318.680145952111458827 tokens and 33,177 holders.

That receipt has a different risk and right map. Its possible exit depends on Ethereum DAI held through the bridge design, mediator contracts, message validation and continued bridge operation. Fork DAI at 0x6B17…d0F is not a receipt for the same escrow.

Sky's later DAI-USDS converter creates another boundary. It supplies a permissionless 1:1 path in the documented Ethereum system, but the fork snapshot predates USDS and the reviewed repository does not promise that PulseChain's copied balance can use it.

No freeze list does not recreate the peg

The copied token code contains no blacklist or freeze function, and no proxy administrator can swap its logic at the same address. That narrow fact matters. It does not mean the asset has no control surface.

Wards affect minting; copied DaiJoin, Vat, oracle and End contracts affect accounting and settlement; PulseChain validators and client software affect transaction order and chain rules. The official bridge has its own mediator and operator risks, but those govern the bridged token rather than fork DAI.

What a holder can prove is an ERC-20 balance usable on PulseChain. The reviewed sources do not add a dollar claim, bank deposit insurance, yield, Maker/Sky equity, governance votes, collateral title or bridge escrow ownership. The fork preserved executable history; every broader right needs new evidence.

How the project changed

  1. 2023-05-10
    Ethereum state is photographed

    Block 17,232,999 at 22:36:11 UTC becomes the PulseChain state snapshot.

  2. 2023-05
    Fork DAI begins an independent history

    The copied 0x6B17…d0F contract runs on chain ID 369 without a bridge deposit.

  3. 2023
    Bridge DAI receives a separate address

    Ethereum DAI crossing the official bridge is represented at 0xefD7…F305.

  4. 2024
    Ethereum's DAI-USDS path arrives later

    Sky documents a permissionless 1:1 converter in the Ethereum system, after the fork snapshot.

Evidence and primary sources

Last evidence review: 2026-09-05

What is DAI on PulseChain?

DAI on PulseChain is an independent ERC-20 state created when PulseChain copied Ethereum at block 17,232,999. It uses the same 0x6B1754…d0F address and Maker DAI bytecode, but lives on chain ID 369. It is neither newly issued by Maker/Sky for PulseChain nor the official bridge receipt for Ethereum DAI.

What problem does DAI on PulseChain solve?

A blockchain fork can copy balances, vault records and authorization slots exactly, yet cannot copy the future work that keeps a credit system alive. Oracles must publish prices, governance must choose parameters, collateral must retain value, liquidations must execute and legal actors must stand behind any promise. The duplicated DAI name hides this break in continuity.

How does DAI on PulseChain work?

The token contract supports transfers, approvals, DAI-style signed allowances using EIP-712, self-burning by holders and minting by ward-authorized addresses. This permit ABI uses nonce, expiry and a boolean allowance rather than ERC-2612's value and deadline. In Maker's design, DaiJoin connects token supply to Vat internal accounting; vault collateral, debt, liquidation and emergency settlement live in other contracts. PulseChain copied that state once and then developed an independent history. Ethereum DAI entering through the official bridge receives a different PulseChain contract, 0xefD7…F305, whose exit depends on bridge escrow and mediators.

Key facts

  • PulseChain copied Ethereum at block 17,232,999 on 10 May 2023 at 22:36:11 UTC. The copy created balances on chain ID 369; no asset crossed a bridge at that moment.
  • At review, fork DAI contract 0x6B17…d0F reported 44,362,143,339.302615804780888911 total supply and 569,707 holders. These are dated chain-state observations, not a hard cap or collateral audit.
  • The direct DAI contract has ward authorization and an authenticated mint path, while holders can burn their own tokens. Its published code has no blacklist/freeze method and is not an upgradeable proxy.
  • In the published DAI source, burn reduces the specified address's balance and total supply. A caller burning another address's tokens needs sufficient allowance; the function itself pays no cash or collateral. Maker's historical collateral recovery design is a separate emergency-settlement process using End, Vat and collateral adapters; it is not an ordinary one-dollar cash redemption.
  • Official-bridge DAI on PulseChain is 0xefD7…F305, labelled 'Dai Stablecoin from Ethereum.' It is distinct from fork DAI even though both show the DAI symbol.
  • Sky's 1:1 DAI-USDS converter is an Ethereum deployment documented after the fork snapshot. Its existence does not establish a conversion right for the PulseChain copy.
  • Control is layered: wards and copied Maker contracts affect token/accounting paths; PulseChain validators and software affect chain execution; bridge operators affect only the bridged representation.
  • A fork DAI balance provides transfer and contract-use ability on PulseChain. Reviewed records provide no USD claim, deposit insurance, yield, Maker/Sky equity, governance vote or bridge escrow ownership.

Official links

Categories

PulseChain EcosystemMade in USA

Frequently asked questions

Is DAI on PulseChain issued by MakerDAO or Sky?

The reviewed evidence identifies it as a copied state at the Ethereum DAI address. The copy occurred through PulseChain's fork, not through a new Maker/Sky issuance agreement for chain ID 369.

Why does it have the same address as Ethereum DAI?

A state fork keeps Ethereum account and contract addresses while starting a separate ledger. The same hexadecimal address therefore identifies different state on Ethereum and PulseChain.

Is the 44.36 billion supply fully collateralized?

The explorer reports token supply, not asset quality. Copied vault and collateral balances do not prove current market value, functioning oracles, liquidation capacity or a maintained governance mandate.

Can a holder redeem it for one dollar?

No reviewed primary record grants that right. The token's burn function destroys tokens without payment. Maker emergency settlement is a conditional protocol process, not ordinary fiat redemption, and its reliable operation on the fork is not established.

What is DAI from Ethereum at 0xefD7…F305?

It is the separate PulseChain representation produced by the official bridge. Its return path depends on the bridge mediator and escrowed Ethereum DAI; fork DAI at 0x6B17…d0F has no automatic claim on that escrow.

Can anyone mint fork DAI?

The token does not expose permissionless minting. Mint is restricted to authorized wards, and Maker's published design authorizes DaiJoin. Whether a mint is economically sound depends on the copied Vat, collateral and governance state, not merely the token guard.

Can an administrator freeze fork DAI?

The published DAI token code has no address blacklist or freeze switch and is a direct contract rather than a proxy. That does not remove ward-based mint authority, copied system-contract controls, chain-level consensus power or market and bridge risks.

Does fork DAI convert to USDS?

Sky documents permissionless 1:1 conversion for its Ethereum system. The reviewed sources do not establish a maintained converter accepting the independent PulseChain fork balance.

External trackers

Choose a tracking site for DAI on PulseChain: