Decentraland

mana
CoinYQ Dossier

Decentraland put land onchain, then left the city in several hands

A parcel can be immutably assigned while the road to see it still passes through clients, content servers and committees. Decentraland’s history is the attempt to make those layers cooperate without pretending that one MANA balance controls them all.

The map arrives before the city

Decentraland began in 2015 as an experiment in recording virtual land and published its first white paper in 2017. The crucial design choice was coordinate ownership: LAND would be an ERC-721 entry, while scenes remained content pointed to by that entry.

MANA supplied the exchange medium and the original auction’s burn mechanism. Its contract kept a holder burn function, so every burn lowers supply permanently. DAO documentation says the owner chain later ended in a destroyed contract, separating MANA from the upgradeable LAND registry.

When the world opened publicly on 20 February 2020, an onchain title system and a working social client arrived together. They were never the same system.

One coordinate is not one currency

Genesis City has 90,601 LAND coordinates. An Estate wraps several parcels in another ERC-721 and can release them again. MANA can buy assets where sellers accept it, but holding MANA does not allocate a coordinate; renting LAND transfers operator permission for a term, not the NFT.

Votes are measured before keys move

The DAO counts 1 VP per MANA, 100 per NAME and 2,000 per LAND or Estate parcel, taking a snapshot when a proposal is created. This is influence over a process, not a treasury share redeemable by each voter.

Snapshot stores signed votes offchain. A three-person DAO Committee submits binding Ethereum actions, and the transaction waits 24 hours. The gap between vote and execution is where trusted keys enter.

The security board can stop the machinery

A second multisig belongs to the five-member Security Advisory Board. It can pause, resume or cancel Committee actions and responds to contract vulnerabilities.

LAND or Estate upgrades require at least three SAB signatures with no dissent. Current guidance also expects community polling, a draft, code, third-party audit and a binding governance vote before Committee or SAB execution.

This makes LAND ownership durable but not frozen forever. The DAO controls the registry’s upgrade path; it explicitly does not control MANA’s extinguished owner powers.

The visible world remains an operated product

The Foundation says it maintains the desktop client, Marketplace and creator tools and plans to transition responsibilities to the DAO by 2030. Catalyst nodes replicate scenes and assets, but clients also depend on realm selection, communications, discovery and other feature services.

LAND records who may deploy to a coordinate; it cannot guarantee that a particular client renders every scene, that every server stays online or that third-party content is lawful. MANA voting power likewise is not Foundation equity, guaranteed revenue or a service-level agreement.

How the project changed

  1. 2015
    Virtual-land prototype

    The project experiments with recording virtual coordinates on a blockchain.

  2. 2017
    Original white paper

    MANA, LAND and user-controlled scene publishing are laid out as separate layers.

  3. 2017-2018
    LAND auctions burn MANA

    Primary parcel allocation turns spent MANA into lower token supply.

  4. 2020-02-19
    DAO treasury vesting begins

    A 222 million MANA, ten-year stream is assigned for community funding.

  5. 2020-02-20
    Public world launch

    The browser world opens and the Foundation begins its launch-era operating role.

  6. 2021
    DAO architecture expands

    Snapshot voting, Committee execution and SAB oversight become the published governance stack.

  7. 2022
    LAND audit and registry work continue

    New deployment reviews show that onchain title contracts still have version-specific upgrade surfaces.

  8. 2024
    White Paper 2.0 and new desktop client

    The platform documents a hybrid architecture and a Foundation-to-DAO transition goal for 2030.

Evidence and primary sources

Last evidence review: 2026-09-05

What is Decentraland?

Decentraland is an Ethereum-linked social virtual world launched publicly in 2020. MANA is its burnable ERC-20 currency; LAND is an ERC-721 for one of Genesis City’s 90,601 coordinates; an Estate is an ERC-721 container for several LAND parcels. The DAO gives MANA, NAME and LAND holders weighted voting power, but committees execute binding actions and the Foundation still develops key clients and tools.

What problem does Decentraland solve?

A MANA balance, a LAND deed, permission to publish a scene, a Snapshot vote and the software that renders the world all confer different powers. Decentraland grew by connecting these layers, so its central tension is whether an onchain property record can remain meaningful when committees move treasury and registry keys and operated services determine what visitors can actually see.

How does Decentraland work?

MANA holders transfer or burn the ERC-20 and receive 1 VP per token in proposal snapshots. LAND owners hold a coordinate NFT, can group parcels in an Estate and delegate update permission without transferring title. Snapshot records votes; a three-person DAO Committee executes binding calls after 24 hours, while the five-member SAB can stop them and authorizes LAND/Estate upgrades with at least three signatures and no dissent. Clients then fetch content and communications from Catalyst and feature services.

Key facts

  • MANA: Ethereum 0x0f5d2fb29fb7d3cfee444a200298f468908cc942, 18 decimals.
  • The MANA contract is burnable; Decentraland says its extinguished ownership chain leaves no wallet able to mint or pause it.
  • Genesis City contains 90,601 coordinate-based LAND parcels; Worlds tied to NAMEs are a separate product.
  • LAND and Estate are ERC-721 assets; an Estate can contain and release several LAND parcels.
  • DAO weights: 1 MANA = 1 VP, 1 NAME = 100 VP, 1 LAND = 2,000 VP, and each Estate parcel = 2,000 VP.
  • Voting is offchain through Snapshot; binding actions rely on a three-person DAO Committee multisig and a 24-hour delay.
  • The five-member SAB can pause, resume or cancel Committee actions; LAND/Estate changes need at least three signatures and no dissent.
  • The DAO controls LAND and Estate contracts and treasury assets, but not the MANA contract.
  • The Foundation maintains the desktop client, Marketplace and creator tools while official architecture also includes centralized feature services.
  • Token or LAND ownership does not establish Foundation equity, guaranteed yield, continuous service or rights in someone else’s content.

Official links

Categories

Related coins

Frequently asked questions

Does owning MANA mean owning LAND?

No. MANA is fungible currency and voting weight. LAND is a separate ERC-721 tied to a coordinate and must be acquired or transferred independently.

Can the DAO mint more MANA?

Official DAO docs say no: the DAO does not own the MANA contract and the ownership chain ended in a self-destructed contract. Holders can still burn their own MANA.

What does LAND ownership control?

The registry gives transfer rights and authority over the parcel’s deployment permissions. It does not convey physical real estate, Foundation shares or copyright in third-party assets.

Does a passed DAO vote execute automatically?

Not generally. Snapshot records the vote; binding Ethereum actions are submitted by the DAO Committee, delayed 24 hours and subject to Committee or SAB cancellation.

Can the SAB change LAND alone?

No single member can. The published process requires at least three SAB signatures with no dissent, plus community and audit stages for upgrades.

Who runs the world client and servers?

The Foundation maintains the main desktop client, Marketplace and creator tools. Independent Catalyst operators distribute content, while some discovery, social and real-time features use centralized services.

External trackers

Choose a tracking site for Decentraland: