The Exact Match source published for the deployed address defines NOXToken as OpenZeppelin ERC-20 code plus a constructor that creates the complete 166,666,666 supply and a burn function that destroys the caller’s tokens. BscScan’s complete ABI has transfers and allowance controls, but no post-deployment mint, owner, pause, blacklist, transfer tax or upgrade method; the address is not presented as a proxy. This narrows discretion inside this token contract. It says nothing about who controls allocation wallets or separate application contracts.
The application proposes a fixed 1:1 upgrade from Arbitrum NOX to BNB NOXO. It says users must first unstake old NOX, choose a destination address, and accept irreversible burning of the old balance. It also says the opening date is still to be announced. Since the old contract has 10 billion units while NOXO has 166,666,666, missing eligibility, snapshot and cap rules are material; the displayed ratio alone cannot explain how all legacy supply would fit.
Tokenomics assigns 70% to a fair launch, 20% to staking, 5% to a DAO Foundation and 5% to liquidity. The staking document describes releasing 100,000 NOXO each day, streamed per second in proportion to stake, with no mandatory lock-up. Because NOXO cannot mint, rewards must come from tokens already created; “issuance” in the document is distribution, not inflation. No staking address is supplied for independent confirmation.
The DAO is also prospective. The documents say Snapshot will be introduced and label governance “future”; a Foundation page proposes that 1% of supply may submit a proposal and that 60% approval is required. The escrow page likewise describes 15 randomly selected arbiters and 9 matching decisions, but gives no production contract. These are design claims until live addresses, code and execution records are published.