SUPER’s most revealing feature is continuity. The same contract has carried three different business stories, so the honest question is which utilities survived each rewrite and who controls the remaining rails.
In January 2021 SuperFarm was pitched as a visual, cross-chain protocol where projects could launch NFT farms, drops and marketplaces without writing code. SUPER would coordinate access, fees and governance.
The first SUPERVERSE was a proposed interoperable world for partner NFTs and three game concepts. The word described a destination before it described the company-facing brand.
Elliot Wainman’s 2022-11-29 relaunch gave the whole project the SuperVerse name. It presented Impostors as live and GigaMart as the new marketplace, with the existing SUPER token as the connective governance asset.
That continuity is unusually clear: the Ethereum contract was not replaced. The same address still carries the SuperFarm name, which is a historical fingerprint rather than evidence of an obsolete token.
Continuity of a token does not make every earlier feature current. Rebranding preserved balances while allowing the product thesis to change.
The verified token caps aggregate supply at one billion. It is not a proxy, but its owner can mint until the cap and any holder can burn; burnFrom follows allowance.
By 2026-09-05 burns had lowered supply by about 1,922.583 SUPER. The owner therefore had equivalent cap headroom. No pause, freeze, blacklist, seizure or transfer-tax logic appears in the contract.
The 2025 transparency report says allocation tranches are fully unlocked while reporting smaller circulating portions for several project buckets. Unlocked, circulating and contract supply are different measures.
SUPER once used Multichain to reach BNB Smart Chain. When that provider collapsed, SuperVerse treated the old representation as a threat surface, snapshotted holders and issued BSC V2 at 0x9ab0…fd1b for a 1:1 swap.
The recovery bridge is one-way toward Ethereum, which the project calls its principal base. BSC V2 balances therefore need lock/burn/release reconciliation; they are not evidence of extra independent SUPER.
DAO membership begins only after staking. The written process gives one vote per staked SUPER, reserves proposal submission for wallets with at least 15,000 staked SUPER, and requires 5% participation plus 60% support over six days. Foundation administrators and Board screen and post proposals.
SVIP-3 passed an intended 80/20 split between community staking rewards and Super Studios maintenance, then required a contract and audit. A passed signal and an implemented perpetual right are not the same thing.
Current state diverged from the old guide: Staker 0x8c96…b887 was owned by RewardClaimer 0x959E…2D81 and had zero ETH, while RewardClaimer held 19.66 ETH and used signer-approved claims. Snapshot did not directly control either contract; the interface DNS also failed.
The original farms were explicitly phased out; GEM balances received a conversion path into SUPER. GigaMart was paused in November 2023 when the team chose to focus fully on gaming.
Impostors still exposes Genesis collectibles and related utilities, though several base, crafting and expansion features remain upcoming. Current SuperVerse pages broaden the network through game integrations.
Blackhole is the clearest current DeFi link. Official pages say smart contracts route 10% of protocol fees to SUPER buybacks and connect SUPER users to Avalanche liquidity.
Buybacks can reduce market float or create demand only as executed; they do not create a debt to holders. Blackhole governance also belongs to BLACK/veBLACK mechanics, not automatically to SUPER votes.
The terms name SuperFarm Foundation as site operator and exclude token contracts from the Services. No source found turns a SUPER balance into Foundation or Super Studios shares, game IP, treasury title, a fixed fee claim or redemption.
A no-code cross-chain NFT farm, drops and marketplace protocol is proposed.
The name describes an interoperable NFT and three-game metaverse concept.
The one-billion-cap Ethereum asset becomes the project token.
A SuperFarm drop demonstrates one piece of the early infrastructure thesis.
The same SUPER token is repositioned around Impostors, GigaMart and DAO governance.
Staked-token governance and the intended treasury split receive Snapshot approval.
The project abandons marketplace operations to focus fully on gaming.
SuperFarm Foundation names Panama law while separating Services from token contracts.
The interface role, self-authorization and absence of reward guarantees are formalized.
Last evidence review: 2026-09-05
SuperVerse is the current name of the ecosystem launched as SuperFarm. Its exact token remains the Ethereum ERC-20 at 0xe53ec727dbdeb9e2d5456c3be40cff031ab40a55. The verified contract still says SuperFarm/SUPER, while current documentation says the rebrand created no new token and holders need not migrate Ethereum balances. A name or ticker match without that address is not this asset.
The ecosystem’s center changed repeatedly. It began with no-code NFT farms and drops, relaunched around Impostors and GigaMart, then paused GigaMart and phased out the original farms. Current pages emphasize game integrations, Blackhole liquidity and a wider gaming/DeFi/AI network. The token persisted; the products did not all persist with it.
SuperVerse addresses fragmentation: each blockchain game usually has its own token, liquidity, collectibles and audience. A shared SUPER community, integrations and liquidity relationships could let games distribute to the same users instead of rebuilding every rail.
The project’s history shows the cost of that ambition. SuperFarm promised tooling, the first SUPERVERSE promised interoperable NFTs and games, and the relaunch promised a two-product umbrella. Some pieces shipped or reached beta; others were paused or replaced. A useful dossier must treat integration as a relationship, not ownership, and a roadmap as a proposal, not a current product.
SUPER’s Ethereum token is a capped, non-proxy ERC-20. Holders can burn; the owner can mint while total supply remains below the one-billion cap. At review supply was about 999,998,077.4169172, leaving a small gap under the cap, and owner was 0x42f7…0137. There is no token-level pause, blacklist, forced transfer or tax.
SUPER representations also appear at Polygon 0xa142…2737, Base 0x3913…b982, Soneium 0xF765…c3D7 and Avalanche 0x09fa…d8c3. Polygon is an upgradeable child-token proxy; Base and Soneium restrict mint/burn to canonical bridges; Avalanche uses an owner-configured LayerZero OFT. BSC V2 0x9ab0…fd1b is the recovery path from old Multichain SUPER. Their local supplies express bridged balances and must not be added to Ethereum supply.
Governance and rewards require staking, but the live contract path has changed. The old DAO Staker 0x8c96…b887 was owned by RewardClaimer 0x959E…2D81, held 35.93M SUPER and zero ETH; RewardClaimer held 8.09M SUPER and 19.66 ETH and used EIP-712 signer-approved migration/reward claims. Older block-by-block reward docs therefore do not establish the current payout formula.
Blackhole creates another economic link: SuperVerse says 10% of its protocol fees buy SUPER. That purchase pressure belongs to Blackhole’s configured contracts and activity. It is not a claim on Blackhole, SuperFarm Foundation or Super Studios, and it does not guarantee token price or cash distribution.
No. Official docs say there is no new token. The canonical Ethereum contract remains 0xe53e…0a55.
It is capped at one billion, but owner minting remains available below the cap and holders can burn. Current supply is slightly below the cap, so “capped” is more accurate than immutable supply.
The current BSC V2 was created to swap the old Multichain-era representation and bridge one way to Ethereum. It should be reconciled as a representation, not added blindly to Ethereum supply.
The DAO guide requires SUPER to be staked. One staked SUPER is one vote, and submitting a proposal requires 15,000 staked SUPER; process administrators also screen and post proposals.
No. Official docs say 10% of Blackhole protocol fees are used for SUPER buybacks. That is different from paying each holder a 10% fee share.
No reviewed legal instrument grants shares, game IP, treasury assets, fixed revenue or redemption. Staking, voting and rewards are conditional protocol uses.
Choose a tracking site for SuperVerse:
