Four.meme existed before BinaryX became Four. The team had already moved from game offerings into open meme-token launches when it decided that the parent should adopt the platform’s name. Even that rename needed a correction: other Four-named tokens made FOUR confusing, so the token became FORM. The March 2025 swap settled the ticker; today’s divergent product websites leave the wider identity less settled.
In February 2024, BinaryX promoted Project Matthew as its first initial game offering of the year. The offer centred on a named space-building game and a defined sale, with whitelist and public participation. By early July, the team had launched Four.meme, where the product was the ability to launch a token rather than access to one selected game. BNB Chain included it in its July 1–7 list of new ecosystem projects.
The token economics were being revised alongside the product range. On August 5, 2024, BinaryX announced that a community vote had led it to lower BNX’s maximum supply to 580 million. Existing game production would continue until the cap, with later game rewards to come from an incentive pool. Reducing the future ceiling was a different act from burning 1.62 billion tokens already held by users.
A September proposal then asked holders to rename BinaryX as Four. In February 2025, the team reported support from the September 21–23 vote and announced the rebrand. Its explanation ran from GameFi through game offerings to Four.meme: the platform had become the identity around which the broader project wanted to gather. The proposed token swap remained 1:1, with the supply and distribution carried over.
Three days after the February 21 announcement, the team revised the ticker. It said multiple Four-named tokens were causing confusion and chose FORM to give the asset a clearer identity on BNB Chain. Four remained the umbrella name. This was a naming correction to an announced migration, not a second conversion ratio.
On March 19, 2025, Binance announced that the BNX-to-FORM swap was complete and set spot trading for 08:00 UTC. The updated schedule superseded the earlier March 21 plan. For balances covered by that exchange migration, the sequence finally produced a concrete result: the same 1:1 conversion appeared under FORM rather than the initially proposed FOUR.
Four.meme’s current page still presents a working token launch and discovery platform. A different page, official.four.meme, which BitMart links alongside the exact FORM contract, now promotes tokenized minerals, energy and computing power. The inspected RWA page names no particular issue, custodian or product contract. It establishes a current marketing direction, not a dated, completed transition into asset issuance. Four’s history therefore contains a clear exchange migration and a less coherent product identity: the name that once followed an already-launched platform now stretches across two different descriptions of what comes next.
BinaryX presents a selected game sale before its later expansion into open meme-token launches.
BNB Chain lists the platform in its July 1–7 roundup. Project accounts disagree between July 2 and July 3.
The proposal schedules a September 21–23 vote; the team later reports support.
The team cites confusion with other Four-named tokens and preserves the 1:1 BNX swap.
FORM spot trading is scheduled for 08:00 UTC that day, replacing the earlier March 21 plan.
Last evidence review: 2026-09-05
Four (FORM) is the BNB Smart Chain successor to BinaryX’s BNX token. The 2025 swap preserved one token for one token. Its contract is 0x5b73A93b4E5e4f1FD27D8b3F8C97D69908b5E284 and it uses 18 decimals. The Four project name, the FORM ticker and tokens independently launched on Four.meme identify different things.
The rebrand announcement described the renamed token as an ecosystem governance token and said existing BNX uses would carry over. Those are project commitments, not proof that every former game, vote or incentive remains available. The FORM website linked by BitMart now presents RWA issuance, while Four.meme remains a token launch platform. The reviewed materials did not provide a product agreement connecting a FORM balance to a specific mineral asset, energy project, computing facility or contractual revenue share.
BinaryX had a naming problem created by its own expansion. A business still known for GameFi and selected game offerings had incubated an open meme-token platform with its own name. Adopting Four was meant to bring the parent brand into line with that product. Other Four-named tokens then made the proposed ticker ambiguous, prompting the further choice of FORM.
Renaming solved identification on participating exchanges. It did not automatically specify how activity across games, meme launches or advertised RWA products would benefit FORM holders. Those connections require product rules and observable execution beyond a shared brand.
FORM transfers are recorded by its BNB Smart Chain token contract. The March 2025 exchange migration converted BNX balances at 1:1; that historical process is not a promise that an exchange or converter still accepts every old BNX balance today. Users must distinguish the exact FORM contract from unrelated FOUR and FORM assets.
Four.meme lets creators launch tokens and users discover or trade them. Those independently issued assets have their own contracts. A successful launch on the platform therefore does not, by itself, establish a FORM burn or fee distribution. Separately, the Four-branded RWA site describes asset evaluation, token issuance, trading, buybacks and automated revenue distribution. Its inspected page does not provide named issuance documents or product contracts with which to test those promises.
The verified FormToken source also exposes burnBNX: it transfers the configured legacy BNX token, 0x5b1f874d0b0C5ee17a495CbB70AB8bf64107A3BD, from the caller to a dead address and mints the same raw amount of FORM, subject to the 580 million cap. This is a BNX-to-FORM conversion, not a FORM burn; successful conversion of a particular wallet was not tested. The owner can add or remove minters and blacklist senders or recipients. The September 5, 2026 read at BNB block 120068992 returned zero appointed minters, but owner 0xd450d7a6daccef9ffbb5f21ea88024a96218f0f4 remained able to appoint them. The owner address contains contract code; its signer configuration was not examined. The direct verified token source has no upgrade entry point or public FORM burn function.
The team first proposed the FOUR ticker, then said existing Four-named tokens were confusing users. On February 24, 2025 it chose FORM for the token while keeping Four as the project brand.
No. The platform launched in early July 2024. The parent project proposed adopting Four in September and announced the rebrand in February 2025, so the product’s identity preceded the parent’s new name.
The announced and Binance-completed ratio was 1 BNX = 1 FORM. The earlier reduction in the maximum supply was a separate decision. Historical exchange support does not establish that an old deposit will still be accepted today.
The reviewed material does not establish a universal FORM-holder fee distribution or burn from every Four.meme launch. Platform tokens and FORM are separate contracts; any economic link needs its own current rules.
That has not been established. BitMart links the RWA-promoting site as FORM’s official website, but the inspected page does not identify particular issues, custodians or product contracts, or grant FORM holders a documented claim to those assets.
The verified contract lets its owner appoint minters up to the 580 million cap and blacklist senders or recipients. The September 5, 2026 snapshot showed zero appointed minters, with ownership retained by 0xd450d7a6daccef9ffbb5f21ea88024a96218f0f4. The separate burnBNX conversion can also mint FORM against legacy BNX; zero minters does not disable that path.
Choose a tracking site for Four:
