CoinYQ Dossier

UnifAI gave its agents a wallet before it gave UAI a visible job

The product already has a working economic language: wallets hold trading assets, strategies charge against swaps or proceeds, and creators collect SOL or USDC. UAI arrived beside that machine as a fixed billion-token supply with promises of access, staking, governance and fee sharing. The contract makes scarcity easy to verify. It does not show where those promises execute.

One constructor closed the mint and opened the distribution question

On 2025-10-29, address 0x79172a…a8A1 deployed UAI in BSC block 66,276,089. The constructor created 1,000,000,000 tokens and sent every unit to 0x7e73bf…8840. KuCoin opened UAI/USDT trading eight days later, on 2025-11-06, using the same BSC contract.

The verified source is unusually narrow. UaiToken inherits OpenZeppelin ERC-20 Permit and adds no owner. There is no later mint, public burn, transfer tax, pause, blacklist, proxy upgrade or bridge method. Signed permit approvals are the only extension beyond ordinary ERC-20 movement.

That closes one risk and exposes another. Code cannot inflate the supply, but it also cannot enforce how the initial recipient divides it. Unlocks, treasury sales and ecosystem grants live in wallet custody or separate contracts, so the important control map begins where this token's ABI ends.

The agent economy currently speaks SOL, USDC and API keys

UnifAI's usable product starts with a sentence rather than a token. A user writes a trigger and an action, chooses a Solana or EVM wallet, funds it and receives execution reports. Developers install an SDK, obtain API keys, and either search dynamic tools or pin a toolkit and action set.

The fee page gives that workflow concrete prices. On-chain swaps carry 0.5%; Meteora strategies list a 0.5% swap fee and a 5% claimed fee; several other strategies list zero. Referrers receive 10% of the transaction fees paid by their referred users during the first year; strategy creators receive 30% of the transaction fees from all wallets copying their strategies. Those rewards go to a hosted wallet as USDC or SOL, with points used for agent fees or airdrops.

UAI is absent from those operational instructions. That does not prove it will never be charged or rewarded. It means the product can be described today without inserting an unsupported token hop, while the claim that UAI powers all interactions remains a separate design statement.

Seven allocation slices add to 100%; the unlock ledger does not

The allocation table is exact: 5.35% investors, 7% liquidity, 20% protocol development, 20.75% foundation and treasury, 15% team and advisors, 18.57% marketing, and 13.33% ecosystem and community. Together they account for the full billion tokens.

The vesting page says investor and team tokens release over multiple years and shows cumulative supply from the token generation event (TGE) through Year 4. CoinYQ did not identify exact initial lockup periods by category, monthly amounts, beneficiary addresses or vesting contracts in the reviewed materials. The chart is a plan, not a reconciled release ledger.

The token page assigns UAI service access, governance, staking and reputation, plus fee sharing for contributors and service providers. In the official materials reviewed, CoinYQ did not identify a staking contract, voting portal, quorum, proposal threshold, delegation system, reward formula or fee-routing address. Those intended roles therefore remain distinct from procedures that this review could verify as deployed.

Privy sits between the promise of control and the agent's hand

An agent that trades needs signing power, and UnifAI's own pages describe that boundary three ways. The DeFi FAQ calls the Privy wallet custodial and says keys are securely stored outside the team's access. The strategy tutorial tells a user how to reveal and export the private key. The Polymarket FAQ says the browser-to-Privy export is end-to-end encrypted and assets remain under user control.

Those statements may describe different wallet modes or an imprecise use of custody, but the documentation does not reconcile them. The safe conclusion is procedural: users interact with a hosted interface and Privy-managed key system, can be offered export, and must verify the recovery and authorization model that applies to their account before allowing autonomous trades.

The legal boundary is thinner still. The token page expressly rejects equity and ownership. CoinYQ found no issuer-specific token terms in the official documentation that grant redemption, treasury ownership, company profits or guaranteed fee distributions. UAI's most defensible biography therefore ends with two separate objects: a fixed token whose code is clear, and an agent service whose relationship to that token remains unfinished in public evidence.

How the project changed

  1. 2025-01-16
    The Python SDK repository is created

    GitHub records this repository's creation on this date. Its currently public code provides tool discovery through UnifAI API keys; the creation timestamp alone does not establish when it became public.

  2. 2025-10-29
    The full billion UAI is minted

    A non-proxy BSC constructor sends the complete fixed supply to one recipient.

  3. 2025-11-06
    UAI/USDT trading begins on KuCoin

    The exchange's world-premiere notice fixes the first documented spot-trading date and BSC network.

Evidence and primary sources

Last evidence review: 2026-09-05

What is UnifAI Network?

UnifAI Network is a hosted agent platform and developer toolkit for discovering tools and automating DeFi actions. A user can describe a strategy in natural language, attach a Solana or EVM wallet, and let an agent react to time or price triggers. Developers can expose actions through open-source Python, JavaScript/TypeScript and Rust SDKs.

UAI is the separate 18-decimal BNB Smart Chain token at 0x3e5d4f8aee0d9b3082d5f6da5d6e225d17ba9ea0. Its verified constructor created the entire 1,000,000,000 supply once. This dossier concerns that UnifAI asset, not other projects or academic terms using UAI.

What problem does UnifAI Network solve?

UnifAI tries to shorten the path from a trading idea to repeated execution: tool discovery, wallet actions and reporting sit behind one agent interface. The difficult question is economic rather than conversational. Current product documentation charges selected strategy fees in traded assets and pays referral or creator rewards in USDC, SOL and points, while a separate token page says UAI powers services, staking, governance and revenue sharing.

The allocation assigns 74.32% to protocol development, foundation/treasury, team/advisors and marketing. The reviewed page names the categories, but CoinYQ did not identify beneficiary wallets, an exact unlock ledger or on-chain spending authority. Fixed supply therefore does not establish decentralized distribution control.

How does UnifAI Network work?

The SDK asks UnifAI's API to discover tools dynamically or loads named toolkits/actions. In the consumer app, a strategy creator writes trigger-plus-action instructions, selects a Privy-powered wallet and funds it with the chain assets needed for execution. Current docs list 0.5% for on-chain swaps, a 0.5% Meteora swap fee and a separate 5% Meteora claimed fee, and zero fees for several other strategies; rewards are settled through hosted wallet flows.

UAI itself is a plain ERC-20 Permit token. It supports balances, transfers, allowances and signed approvals. It has no deployed owner, mint, burn, pause, blacklist, upgrade or bridge entry point. Any staking, governance, revenue distribution, treasury release or agent-service charging system therefore requires a separate contract or off-chain process that the reviewed official material did not identify.

Key facts

  • Canonical asset: UnifAI Network UAI on BNB Smart Chain, contract 0x3e5d4f8aee0d9b3082d5f6da5d6e225d17ba9ea0, 18 decimals.
  • The constructor minted 1,000,000,000 UAI once to 0x7e73bf32989ec9a18164960399de0d766e138840.
  • The verified token is not a proxy and exposes no owner, further mint, burn, pause, blacklist or bridge function.
  • Allocation: investors 5.35%, liquidity 7%, protocol 20%, foundation/treasury 20.75%, team/advisors 15%, marketing 18.57%, ecosystem/community 13.33%.
  • Current product economics document asset-denominated fees and USDC/SOL/points rewards, not a required UAI payment path.
  • UAI governance, staking and fee sharing are project claims; CoinYQ did not identify implementation addresses, thresholds or formulas in the reviewed official materials.
  • Official wallet pages conflict between the label custodial and an exportable, Privy-managed private-key flow.
  • The token page expressly says UAI does not represent equity or ownership. CoinYQ did not obtain issuer-specific token terms establishing redemption, treasury ownership or guaranteed revenue rights; the missing terms are a review limit, not a reviewed contractual denial of every possible right.
  • The SDKs are open source, while API keys and the hosted console remain part of the operating path.

Official links

Categories

Related coins

Frequently asked questions

Which UAI does this page cover?

UnifAI Network's BEP-20 token at 0x3e5d…9ea0. It is distinct from Unifi Protocol DAO, Universal AI, the academic UAI conference and other similarly named assets.

Must users pay current UnifAI strategy fees in UAI?

The reviewed product page does not say so. It quotes fees against swaps or claimed proceeds and settles documented creator/referral rewards in USDC, SOL and points. The token page separately describes future or ecosystem-wide UAI utility.

Can the team print or freeze UAI through this token contract?

The verified contract has no such callable functions. Its full billion supply was minted in the constructor and it has no owner, proxy upgrade, pause or blacklist. Separate treasury, staking, app and custody systems can still have administrators.

When do team and investor tokens unlock?

Official material says releases are phased over years and shows a cumulative chart, but does not state exact category-by-category cliffs, monthly quantities, beneficiary wallets or vesting contract addresses.

What voting and staking rights are live?

The project assigns UAI governance and staking roles. The reviewed sources do not identify a voting portal or contract, proposal threshold, quorum, delegation rules, staking address, reward formula or slashing conditions, so those mechanics cannot be stated as deployed.

Is the UnifAI wallet self-custodial?

The documentation is internally inconsistent. One page calls it custodial, another lets users reveal a private key, and a third says Privy manages encrypted keys without UnifAI access. Users should verify the exact wallet mode and recovery/export path they use.

Does holding UAI grant company equity or fee income?

The token page expressly excludes equity and ownership. It describes revenue sharing for contributors and service providers, but CoinYQ did not obtain issuer-specific legal terms or identify a distribution contract establishing guaranteed fee or treasury claims for each UAI holder.

Does open-source SDK code make the whole service decentralized?

No. The SDKs let developers discover and serve tools, but examples require UnifAI API keys and a hosted console. The code confirms an integration interface, not independent operation of discovery, execution, custody or governance infrastructure.

External trackers

Choose a tracking site for UnifAI Network: